Key result
Following a gastrointestinal bleed, rebleeding rates were higher in patients receiving anticoagulants compared to antiplatelets.
Why the study?
Patients who develop gastrointestinal bleeding while taking anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy represent a clinical challenge regarding the risks of rebleeding, vascular events, and death.
Does resumption of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy after gastrointestinal bleeding reduce vascular events and death in patients who developed major gastrointestinal bleeding?
Cohort (n=871)
Does resumption of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy after gastrointestinal bleeding reduce vascular events and death in patients who developed major gastrointestinal bleeding?
Resumption of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy after a gastrointestinal bleeding event is associated with a lower risk of vascular events and death, which outweighs the increased risk of rebleeding.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide cautious resumption choices after gastrointestinal bleed; leaves open net benefit of anticoagulants versus antiplatelets in observational data.
BACKGROUND: Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding during anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy represent a clinical challenge. AIM: To determine the risk/rates of rebleeding, vascular events and death in patients treated with antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents who developed major gastrointestinal bleeding METHODS: This was an observational cohort study of patients who developed gastrointestinal bleeding while on antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy. Drug use information was collected prospectively during bleeding events. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate rebleeding, vascular events and death. RESULTS: Among 871 patients (mean age 78.9 ± 8.6 years), 38.9% used an anticoagulant, 52.5% used an antiplatelet and 8.6% used both; 93.1% interrupted treatment after gastrointestinal bleeding and 80.5% restarted therapy within 7.6 ± 36.4 days; 38.7% had upper gastrointestinal bleeds, 46.7% lower gastrointestinal bleeds and 14.6% gastrointestinal bleeds of unknown origin. Median follow-up was 24.9 months (IQR: 7.0-38.0). Resumption of both therapies was associated with a higher risk of rebleeding, lower risk of ischaemic events or death and a similar risk for upper and lower gastrointestinal events. Resumption of therapy ≤ 7 days after bleeding showed a similar pattern with no differences in death. Rebleeding rates were higher in anticoagulant vs antiplatelet patients (138.0 vs 99.0 events per 1000 patient-years), and the bleeding location was identical in 61.8% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Resumption of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy after a gastrointestinal bleeding event was associated with a lower risk of vascular events and death and a higher rebleeding risk. The benefits of early reinstitution of anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy outweigh the gastrointestinal-related risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sostres et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Gastrointestinal bleeding during anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy (n=871). Anticoagulant therapy vs. Antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on Rebleeding. Following a gastrointestinal bleed, rebleeding rates were higher in patients receiving anticoagulants compared to antiplatelets.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: