Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
The authors argue that the association between spinal manipulation and cerebrovascular accidents may be overstated, emphasizing the need to re-evaluate spontaneous cervical artery dissections.
Over the past 5 to 10 years, the issue of cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) and spinal manipulation has become a debate of ever-increasing intensity. A copious number of studies have investigated spinal manipulation as a putatative causative factor of CVAs1-5; however, a common theme among these is the failure to consider that the majority of vertebrobasilar accidents (VBAs) may be spontaneous, cumulative, or caused by factors other than spinal manipulation. The problem is not served by the sometimes hysterical reactions apparent in the media over the past 2 years in reaction to the flawed investigations.6-11 In light of these recent reports, the entire phenomenon of spontaneous cervical artery dissections should be revisited to put this matter into a better perspective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anthony L. Rosner (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: