Why the study?
Does pegylated interferon-alpha-2b at 1.5 microg/kg improve sustained virological response compared to 1 microg/kg in naïve Japanese patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 2?
Does pegylated interferon-alpha-2b at 1.5 microg/kg improve sustained virological response compared to 1 microg/kg in naïve Japanese patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 2?
A starting dose of 1.5 microg/kg of pegylated interferon-alpha-2b is more effective than 1 microg/kg for achieving sustained virological response in naïve Japanese patients with HCV genotype 2.
Supports 1.5-μg/kg pegylated interferon-alpha-2b to maximize SVR in naïve HCV genotype 2; extends RCT evidence for dose optimization.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (PEG-I) at 1 and 1.5 microg/kg, and in combination with ribavirin (RBV) for 24 weeks in naïve Japanese patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 2. METHODS: The present study was an open-label, randomized trial of 55 patients receiving PEG-I (1 or 1.5 microg/kg body weight [BW], subcutaneously, once a week) and RBV for 24 weeks. The patients were followed up for 24 weeks without treatment. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analyses showed that the proportion of patients with a sustained virological response (SVR) in the 1-microg/kg PEG-I-RBV group (38.5%, 10/26) was lower than that of the 1.5-microg/kg PEG-I-RBV group (74.1%, 20/27; P = 0.013). The PEG-I dose was reduced in two of the 26 patients of the 1-microg/kg PEG-I-RBV group (one because of thrombocytopenia at 2 weeks, and one because of generalized fatigue at 20 weeks), and four of the 27 patients of the 1.5-microg/kg PEG-I-RBV group (one because of neutropenia at 20 weeks, and three because of generalized fatigue at 1, 5, and 8 weeks). The multivariate analysis identified age (< 60 years) and dose of PEG-I (1.5 microg/kg) as significant determinants of SVR. CONCLUSION: The dose of PEG-I to be used at the start of therapy should be 1.5-microg/kg BW in naïve Japanese patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawaoka et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: