Why the study?
Does the Coherex FlatStent/FlatStent EF in-tunnel PFO closure system safely and effectively achieve PFO closure in patients with a clinical indication?
Does the Coherex FlatStent/FlatStent EF in-tunnel PFO closure system safely and effectively achieve PFO closure in patients with a clinical indication?
The second-generation Coherex FlatStent EF device demonstrated improved in-tunnel PFO closure rates (76% complete closure) compared to the first-generation device at 6 months, with an acceptable safety profile in a first-in-man study.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support second-generation device iteration for PFO closure; leaves open randomized confirmation of clinical benefit.
OBJECTIVE: The Coherex-EU Study evaluated the safety and efficacy of PFO closure utilizing novel in-tunnel PFO closure devices. BACKGROUND: Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) followed the development of transcatheter closure devices designed to patch atrial septal defects (ASDs). The Coherex FlatStent™ and FlatStent™ EF devices were designed specifically to treat PFO anatomy. METHODS: A total of 95 patients with a clinical indication for PFO closure were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter first in man study at six clinical sites. Thirty-six patients received the first-generation FlatStent study device, and 57 patients received the second-generation FlatStent EF study device, which was modified based on clinical experience during the first 38 cases. Two patients enrolled to receive the first generation did not receive a device. RESULTS: At 6 months post-procedure, 45% (17/38) of the intention-to-treat (ITT) cohort receiving the first-generation FlatStent device had complete closure, 26% (10/38) had a trivial residual shunt, and 29% (11/38) had a moderate to large residual shunt. In the ITT cohort receiving the second-generation FlatStent EF device, 76% (43/57) had complete closure, 12% (7/57) had a trivial shunt, and 12% had a moderate to large shunt. Five major adverse events occurred, all without sequelae. CONCLUSION: This initial study of the Coherex FlatStent/FlatStent EF PFO Closure System demonstrated the potential for in-tunnel PFO closure. The in-tunnel Coherex FlatStent EF may offer an alternative to septal repair devices for PFO closure in appropriately selected patients; however, further investigation will be necessary to establish the best use of this device.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sievert et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: