Why the study?
Total hip arthroplasty is associated with substantial blood loss leading to postoperative anemia, prompting a comparison of the efficacy and safety of oral versus intravenous tranexamic acid.
Does oral tranexamic acid reduce blood loss and transfusion rates as effectively as intravenous tranexamic acid in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty?
Does oral tranexamic acid reduce blood loss and transfusion rates as effectively as intravenous tranexamic acid in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty?
Oral tranexamic acid is as effective as intravenous administration in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements in total hip arthroplasty, without increasing thromboembolic risk.
Supports oral TXA substitution for IV in THA to simplify dosing; confirms equivalence across aggregated RCTs.
BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty is associated with substantial blood loss which can lead to postoperative anemia. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid (TXA) and intravenous TXA. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception until December 2019. A combined searching strategy of subject words and random words was adopted. Only clinical randomized controlled trials were included. The comparisons were made with regard to total blood loss, hemoglobin drop, transfusion rate, and postoperative thromboembolic complications including deep vein thrombolism (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). The meta-analysis was conducted by using the Review Manager 5.3, and bias evaluation was performed based on the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0. RESULTS: In this meta-analysis, five randomized controlled trials were included. The results showed that there were no significant differences between the oral TXA group and intravenous TXA group concerning total blood loss [mean difference (MD) =3.01, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): - 43.90 to 49.92, p = 0.90], hemoglobin drop (MD = 0.05, 95% CI: - 0.10 to 0.20, p = 0.50) and transfusion rate of allogeneic blood [risk ratio (RR) =1.09, 95% CI: 0.46 to 2.62, p = 0.84]. No significant difference was found in the incidence of thromboembolic events (RR = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.71 to 4.16, p = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with intravenous TXA, oral TXA is equally able to reduce total blood loss, hemoglobin drop, and transfusion requirement for total hip arthroplasty. It is a lower-cost method that does not increase the incidence of thromboembolic events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qi et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: