Why the study?
Sex differences in chronic cardiac adaptation in response to distinct modalities of exercise training in humans had not previously been described.
Do sex differences exist in cardiac adaptation to endurance and resistance exercise training in untrained subjects?
Do sex differences exist in cardiac adaptation to endurance and resistance exercise training in untrained subjects?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Endurance training induces eccentric hypertrophy more apparently in males than females, while resistance training does not cause notable cardiac changes in either sex.
PURPOSE: No previous study has described sex differences in chronic cardiac adaptation in response to distinct modalities of exercise training in humans. METHODS: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (1.5 T) was used to assess left ventricular (LV) outcomes in 78 untrained subjects (46F, 26 M; 26.1 ± 5.4 yr). Subjects underwent 3 months of closely supervised and monitored resistance (RES) and endurance (END) training, separated by a 3-month washout period. RESULTS: LV mass (LVM) increased in response to END in both sexes (females △3.98 ± 7.98 g, P = 0.002; males △5.99 ± 10.67 g, P = 0.005), whereas LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) increased in males (△7.48 ± 11.91 mL, P = 0.002) but not females (△1.54 ± 10.49 mL, P = 0.373). In response to RES, LVM and EDV did not increase in either sex. The proportion of subjects exhibiting a positive response to training (i.e., a change >0) for LVM and EDV did not differ between sexes for either training modality. CONCLUSION: Eccentric hypertrophy in response to END training was more apparent in males than females, whereas there were no notable cardiac changes between sexes for RES training. The proportion of low versus high responders to training was not sex specific for LVM or EDV in response to either commonly prescribed exercise training modality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marsh et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: