Why the study?
To compare the applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine versus lateral position during lower limb fracture surgery.
Does ultrasound combined nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine position reduce the dose of sufentanil used in surgery compared to the lateral position in patients undergoing lower limb fracture surgery?
Does ultrasound combined nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine position reduce the dose of sufentanil used in surgery compared to the lateral position in patients undergoing lower limb fracture surgery?
Lumbosacral plexus block in the supine position is simpler to apply and more comfortable for patients during lower limb fracture surgery, with similar anesthetic efficacy to the lateral position.
Supine lumbosacral plexus block matches lateral for sufentanil dosing while lowering positioning pain; supports clinical preference for comfort in lower limb fracture surgery.
Background: To compare the applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block (LSPB) in supine versus lateral position during the lower limb fracture surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent elective internal fixation for lower limb fracture were divided into the S group and the L group by the random number table method and received LSPB guided by ultrasound combined nerve stimulator in supine and lateral positions, respectively. The primary outcome examined was the dose of sufentanil used in surgery and the secondary outcomes were the maximum VAS pain score at position placing for LSPB, the time of position placing, the time for nerve block and the number of puncture attempts. Results: The maximum pain score at position placing, the time of position placing for nerve block, the time for lumbar plexus block and the time of puncture attempts were significantly lower in the S group compared with those of the L group (all P <0.05). However, the time for sacral plexus block was higher in the S group compared with that of the L group ( P <0.05). The heart rate and mean arterial pressure at different time points, times of puncture attempts for sacral plexus, dose of sufentanil used, VAS scores, the satisfactory postoperative degree to analgesia and adverse events of nerve block did not significantly differ between the two groups (all P >0.05). Conclusions: LSPB in the supine position is simple to apply and has definite anesthetic effects. Meanwhile, it has a high comfort level and therefore should be widely applied. The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment at the Chinese Clinical Trail Registry (Date:11/03/2021 Number: ChiCTR2100044117).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: