Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 12, 2019Global Change BiologyOpen Access

State of the science in reconciling top‐down and bottom‐up approaches for terrestrial CO2 budget

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MKMasayuki KondoHiroshima UniversityPPPrabir K. PatraJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
Stephen Sitch
Stephen SitchKarlsruhe Institute of Technology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Kondo et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7e740437c44f9ef44fa441https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14917
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model2003 · 3,586 citations
  2. 2North American terrestrial CO2 uptake largely offset by CH4 and N2O emissions: toward a full accounting of the greenhouse gas budget2014 · 187 citations
  3. 3Anthropogenic land use estimates for the Holocene – HYDE 3.22017 · 1,231 citations
  4. 4Global atmospheric carbon budget: results from an ensemble of atmospheric CO 2 inversions2013 · 535 citations
  5. 5North America's net terrestrial CO 2 exchange with the atmosphere 1990–20092015 · 70 citations