Why the study?
Does paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty with cobalt-chromium stents reduce late lumen loss compared to conventional angioplasty with paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic patients with native coronary artery stenoses?
Does paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty with cobalt-chromium stents reduce late lumen loss compared to conventional angioplasty with paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic patients with native coronary artery stenoses?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty combined with a cobalt-chromium stent yields similar 9-month angiographic and clinical outcomes compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic patients.
AIMS: Coronary lesions in diabetics (DM) are associated with a high recurrence following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), even after drug-eluting stent (DES) deployment. Encouraging clinical data of the drug-eluting balloon catheter (DEB) SeQuent Please warrant its investigation in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-four diabetic patients (60.8 ± 9.1 years, 76.2% male) were randomised to either the DEB SeQuent Please or the DES Taxus Liberté to compare the 9-month clinical and angiographic outcome of PCI in native coronary arteries. Comparing the DEB vs. the DES the 9-month results (follow-up DEB 39/45 [86.7%], DES 36/39 [92.3%]) are statistically not different at the 0.05 level for the primary endpoint of in-segment (0.37 ± 0.59 mm vs. 0.35 ± 0.63 mm) and in-stent (0.51 ± 0.61 mm vs. 0.53 ± 0.67 mm) late lumen loss, overall and cardiac deaths (2/45 [4.4%] and 3/45 [6.7%] vs. 0), target lesion revascularisation (3/45 [8.9%] vs. 4/39 [10.3%]), the total MACE rate (6/45 [13.3%] vs. 6/39 [15.4%]), and the event free survival after 10.2 ± 3.8 months (Kaplan-Meier analysis, p<0.80, log rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and angiographic outcome of the combination of the drug-eluting balloon SeQuent Please with a cobalt chromium stent compared to the drug eluting Taxus stent are similar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: