Why the study?
Pre-participation evaluation helps prevent sudden cardiac death in athletes, and cardiac computed tomography has emerged as a valuable low-radiation tool for detecting coronary anomalies in young athletes and coronary artery disease in master athletes.
What is the role of cardiac computed tomography in the pre-participation evaluation of competitive athletes?
What is the role of cardiac computed tomography in the pre-participation evaluation of competitive athletes?
Cardiac computed tomography is an emerging, low-radiation imaging modality useful for stratifying cardiovascular risk and detecting coronary anomalies or disease in competitive athletes during pre-participation evaluation.
In recent years, the role of pre-participation evaluation (PPE) in the prevention of sudden cardiac death in competitive athletes has become evident. Most physicians routinely supplement assessment by resting electrocardiogram with imaging techniques, such as echocardiography. The primary goal of imaging in the clinical assessment of competitive athletes is to exclude cardiovascular conditions associated with adverse outcomes. Cardiac computed tomography is emerging as an important technique for stratifying cardiovascular risk and assessing coronary artery disease (CAD), particularly in master athletes. Conversely, in young athletes, this technique has the best non-invasive coronary artery resolution and provides valuable details on coronary artery anatomy. Recent technical developments have brought about a dramatic reduction in radiation exposure, a major drawback of this diagnostic method; nowadays cardiac computed tomography may be performed at a dose of barely one millisievert. The present review provides a practical guide for the use of cardiac computed tomography in the PPE of competitive athletes, with a specific focus on its value for detecting congenital coronary anomalies and CAD in young and master athletes, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Ascenzi et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: