Why the study?
Evaluating surgical outcomes and identifying perioperative variables associated with poor prognosis are necessary to guide appropriate interventions for obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis.
Does direct redo surgery compared to surgery after failed thrombolysis improve survival in patients with obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis?
Does direct redo surgery compared to surgery after failed thrombolysis improve survival in patients with obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis?
Direct surgical intervention for prosthetic valve thrombosis without prior fibrinolysis is associated with lower mortality compared to surgery after failed thrombolysis.
Identifies perioperative risks in prosthetic valve thrombosis redo surgery; leaves open need for prospective validation before informing practice.
BACKGROUND: Obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis is a life-threatening complication associated with high morbidity and mortality. Evaluation of outcomes of surgical management and identification of the perioperative variables associated with poor prognosis are necessary to provide appropriate interventions. RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 39 patients who underwent redo surgery for obstructive prosthetic valve at the Madinah Cardiac Center, Saudi Arabia. Between January 2017 to October 2023 Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors that influenced the outcome were analyzed. The nature of the obstructed valve was commonly mechanical (32/39, 82.1%) located in the mitral position (30/39, 76.9%) which occurred due to thrombosis, and the size of the thrombus was more than 1 cm in 27 (69.2%) patients. High percentage (25/39, 64.1%) of the patients had a suboptimal INR (less than 2). The major postoperative complications were respiratory failure (6/39, 15.4%) and dysrhythmias (20/39, 51.3%). The 30-day postoperative mortality was 7.7% (3/39). Patients who underwent surgery after failed thrombolysis had significantly higher mortality than those who underwent direct surgery (p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Prosthetic valve thrombosis is primarily associated with suboptimal anticoagulant therapy and can occur years after valve replacement surgery. The prognosis for redo valve replacement is favorable with a 30-day operative mortality rate of 7.7%. For patients with prosthetic valve thrombosis, direct surgical intervention without prior fibrinolysis may be safe and effective for patients with prosthetic valve thrombosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tolah et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: