Why the study?
Patients with HFrEF often do not receive sacubitril/valsartan due to concerns about hypotension, leaving the feasibility of initiating a very low dose in potentially intolerant patients unclear.
Does initiating sacubitril/valsartan at a very low dose (25 mg twice daily) allow for feasible treatment and similar outcomes compared to standard dose initiation in potentially intolerant patients with HFrEF?
Does initiating sacubitril/valsartan at a very low dose (25 mg twice daily) allow for feasible treatment and similar outcomes compared to standard dose initiation in potentially intolerant patients with HFrEF?
Initiating sacubitril/valsartan at a very low dose of 25 mg twice daily is feasible and effective for HFrEF patients potentially intolerant to standard starting doses.
May support very low-dose sacubitril/valsartan initiation in intolerant HFrEF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Aims Sacubitril/valsartan is superior to enalapril in reducing the risks of cardiovascular death and preventing hospitalization in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, patients often do not receive sacubitril/valsartan because of concerns about hypotension. We examined the feasibility of initiating sacubitril/valsartan at a very low dose (VLD) in potentially intolerant patients with HFrEF and subsequent dose up-titration, treatment persistence and outcomes. Methods and Results We analyzed 206 patients with HFrEF grouped according to starting sacubitril/valsartan dose. The VLD group (n=106) commenced 25 mg twice daily, and the standard-dose (SD) group (n=100) started on ≥50 mg twice daily. Baseline systolic blood pressure was 103±12 mmHg vs. 119±14 mmHg in the SD group (P<0.001). The maximal target dose achievement rate was higher in the SD group (27.0% vs 9.4%, p=0.001) and the VLD group experienced more dose up-titrations and fewer down-titrations than the SD group. The VLD group had a decrease in N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) similar to the SD group and a similar increase in left ventricular ejection fraction. There were no significant differences in symptomatic hypotension, worsening renal function, hyperkalemia, cardiovascular mortality, and rehospitalization due to HF between the two groups during follow-up period. Conclusions In patients considered by the treating physician likely to be intolerant of sacubitril/valsartan, initiation with 25 mg twice daily was generally possible and patients remained in therapy, with similar decreases in NT-proBNP and increases in left ventricular ejection fraction to those observed in patients receiving SD sacubitril/valsartan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: