Why the study?
AAS demands urgent CTA diagnosis, but manual diagnosis efficiency and accuracy remain limited.
Does an AI-powered decision support system match diagnostic accuracy and improve time efficiency compared to manual interpretation by radiologists in patients undergoing CTA for suspected acute aortic syndrome?
Does an AI-powered decision support system match diagnostic accuracy and improve time efficiency compared to manual interpretation by radiologists in patients undergoing CTA for suspected acute aortic syndrome?
An AI-based decision support system accurately segments and diagnoses acute aortic syndrome subtypes on CTA, performing non-inferiorly to senior radiologists while drastically reducing interpretation time.
AI tool may aid urgent AAS CTA diagnosis; leaves open prospective outcome trials before clinical adoption.
Acute aortic syndrome (AAS), encompassing aortic dissection (AD), intramural hematoma (IMH), and penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU), demands urgent computed tomography angiography (CTA) diagnosis, while manual diagnosis efficiency and accuracy remain limited. This study develops and externally validates an AI-powered AAS decision support system (AAS-DSS) for automated 17-zone aortic segmentation (per the extended Society for Vascular Surgery/Society of Thoracic Surgeons [SVS/STS] classification) and slice-level AAS subtype classification. Trained on 586 CTA scans with nnUNet version 2 (nnUNet v.2), TotalSegmentor, and ResNet-18, and validated on 198 multi-institutional cases, AAS-DSS achieves excellent segmentation and high classification accuracy, outperforming junior radiologists and showing performance non-inferior to those of senior radiologists, with reduced interpretation time. The findings confirm AAS-DSS's strong cross-institutional generalizability, accelerating time-critical AAS diagnosis and supporting standardized management, especially in resource-limited settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: