Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Mobilization of circulating stem cells from the bone marrow with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) might promote the repair of myocardial damage after ST-elevation myocardial infarction. However, concern has been raised about the safety of G-CSF. Objective: To determine the short-term (30 days) safety of G-CSF therapy after an ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Patients with an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (treated with PCI <12 h after symptom onset) were enrolled in the STEMMI trial and randomized to G-CSF (10 µg/kg/day) or placebo for 6 days in a double-blind design. Clinical follow-up for this report was done after 1 month. The treatment allocation remains blinded and long-term follow-up is ongoing. Results: Seventy-eight patients (age 56 ± 8.4 years, 80% males, maximal creatine kinase MB 307 ± 193 µg/l) were included. G-CSF treatment was initiated 1 day (range 0–2) after PCI. Three (4%) patients suffered major adverse cardiac events in the first 30 days (1 died in progressive shock, 1 had a subacute stent thrombosis, and 1 developed significant mitral valve regurgitation). No patients had symptoms of early aggressive restenosis, and there were no cases of unstable angina or re-infarction. Eleven patients had minor musculoskeletal pain during the G-CSF treatment period. Conclusion: In this relatively small population of patients there were few major adverse cardiac events and G-CSF treatment after ST-elevation myocardial infarction seemed safe in the short (30 days) term. Further studies of long-term safety will clarify the future role of G-CSF treatment in this setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ripa et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: