Diagnostic study demonstrates superior sensitivity and specificity of artificial intelligence over endoscopists in gastric lesions, indicating potential to improve early cancer detection.
In this study, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) system to support the diagnosis of early gastric cancer using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (NBI), with the goal of improving the diagnostic accuracy of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the AI-based system compared to endoscopists. A total of 500 cases, including early gastric cancer and non-cancer cases, were used to develop the diagnostic support AI system. We evaluated the AI system with models created using k-fold cross-validation. We determined the diagnostic performance of the AI system and 10 endoscopists (five experts and five non-experts) for detecting early gastric cancer and compared the diagnostic performance between the AI system and endoscopists. Histopathological diagnosis was used as the gold standard for cancerous lesions, while magnifying endoscopic diagnosis with high confidence served as the gold standard for non-cancerous lesions. The median (interquartile range, IQR) sensitivity for the AI system and all endoscopists was 100% (100–100%) and 76.8% (65.5-78.9%), respectively. The sensitivity of the AI system was significantly higher than that of the endoscopists (P = 0.002). The median (IQR) specificity for the AI system and all endoscopists was 100% (99.0-100%) and 86.0% (72.0-91.8%), respectively. The specificity of the AI system was also significantly higher (P = 0.01). This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying the diagnostic support AI system during magnified observation with NBI and suggests that it could enhance the diagnostic accuracy of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for early gastric cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: