Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare three definitions of the nocturnal period in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and assess their agreement in determining nocturnal blood pressure dipping patterns.
Does the method of defining the nocturnal period (actigraphy, fixed-time, or self-reported) affect the classification of nocturnal blood pressure dipping patterns in subjects with metabolic syndrome?
Does the method of defining the nocturnal period (actigraphy, fixed-time, or self-reported) affect the classification of nocturnal blood pressure dipping patterns in subjects with metabolic syndrome?
The method used to define the nocturnal period during 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring significantly impacts the classification of blood pressure dipping patterns, with actigraphy reclassifying 20% of patients compared to self-report.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Variable nocturnal BP definitions affect dipping classification; leaves open optimal method for metabolic syndrome.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to compare three definitions of ambulatory blood pressure (BP) nocturnal period and to assess their agreement in determining nocturnal BP dipping patterns. METHODS: We investigated 69 subjects with metabolic syndrome, aged 50-55 years. In all subjects, we assessed 24-h BP monitoring, electrocardiogram and actigraphy profiles. The nocturnal period was defined in three ways: as a fixed narrow nighttime period from 01:00 to 06:00, as a self-reported sleeping period and as a disappearance and onset of physical activity recorded by the actigraph. RESULTS: Our study revealed a significant discrepancy between the self-reported and actigraphy-based nocturnal periods (P < 0.001). In addition, different definitions of the nighttime yielded significant differences in determining nondipping, extreme dipping and dipping BP patterns, the identification of the latter being affected the most. The actigraphy-based approach best aligned with the fixed-time determination of the nocturnal period: Cohen's kappa coefficient for the nondipping pattern was 0.78 (0.58-1), for the dipping pattern 0.75 (0.59-0.91) and for the extreme dipping pattern 0.81 (0.65-0.97). In comparison to the self-reported determination of the nocturnal period, using the actigraphy-based approach resulted in reclassifying the nocturnal BP pattern in 20.3% of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of agreement between fixed-time, self-reported and actigraphy-based determinations of the nighttime period affects the identification of the nocturnal BP patterns. In comparison to the self-reported nocturnal period estimation, the actigraphy-based approach results in the reclassification of BP dipping status in every fifth subject.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slušnienė et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: