Let's talk: an analysis of the “vote vs. negotiated withdrawal” decision for social activist environmental health shareholder resolutions

Social and environmental shareholder activists engage in a form of corporate social governance by submitting proxy resolutions for a specific change in corporate behavior deemed to be harmful to society. Using a unique data-set for environmental health shareholder resolutions filed by shareholder activists at 70 different companies during 2006–2011, we examine the success rate of resolutions and characteristics affecting the “vote vs. negotiated withdrawal” decision. Supporting a self-interest hypothesis, resolutions targeting specific consumer/retail companies, with regard to chemicals in products or product safety issues, are more likely to be negotiated and withdrawn, while firms with entrenchment-related governance characteristics are more likely to be voted on. Examining wealth effects, consumer/retail companies with a resolution vote experience a −0.38% stock price reaction surrounding the annual meeting date, resulting in a significant economic average loss of −$453.5 million.