Pediatric heart failure has distinct etiologies compared to adults, requiring specific diagnostic and management approaches.
Cardiac failure is a clinical syndrome where the heart is unable to provide the output required to meet the metabolic demands of the body; however, the causes and mechanisms of cardiac failure are significantly different between adults and children. In children, cardiac failure is most often caused by congenital heart disease and cardiomyopathy. These causes are significantly different from those usually responsible for the conditions in adults, which include coronary artery disease and hypertension. Other significant causes of heart failure in children are cardiomyopathy and anthracycline toxicity, which lead to low‐output cardiac failure. The diagnosis of CHF relies on several sources of clinical findings, including history, physical examination and echocardiographic studies. Echocardiographic studies are the most helpful noninvasive studies. Plasma levels of natriuretic peptides, Atrial Natriuretic Peptide (ANP) and Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP), are increased in most patients with heart failure. The plasma levels of these peptides are elevated in the newborn and in the first weeks of life but decrease of the levels observed in normal adults. Increased levels of BNP and the N-terminal of its prohormone have been reported in most children with either pressure or volume overload cardiac lesions compared with the levels seen in normal children. However, the usefulness of the levels of these peptides appears limited because an appropriate reference range has not been established. The treatment of CHF consists of elimination of the underlying causes, treatment of the precipitating or contributing causes, and control of the heart failure state. Eliminating the underlying causes is the most desirable approach whenever possible. That is why clinicians need up-to-date knowledge about pediatric heart failure. The present review comprehensively describes all the aspects of pediatric heart failure including the recent approaches
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AZAK et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: