Why the study?
Does the presence of an in-stent hypodense area at two weeks following carotid artery stenting predict neointimal hyperplasia at two years?
Does the presence of an in-stent hypodense area at two weeks following carotid artery stenting predict neointimal hyperplasia at two years?
An in-stent hypodense area at two weeks post-carotid artery stenting and pretreatment ulceration predict thicker neointimal hyperplasia at two years, suggesting the need for prolonged follow-up.
Suggests early imaging markers may identify patients requiring prolonged surveillance after carotid stenting;.
Introduction It has not been reported how long the follow-up study after carotid artery stenting (CAS) should be continued. The purpose of the present study is to clarify the dynamic change of the in-stent neointimal layer and residual arterial lumen by two years following CAS using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography (3D CTA) with volume rendering. Methods Thirty-six stented carotid arteries in 34 consecutive patients were examined by 3D CTA with volume rendering at two weeks and 3, 6, 12, 24 months of follow-up. Results An in-stent hypodense area could be detected in 10 of 36 (27.8%) carotid arteries at two weeks after CAS. In-stent hypodense areas gradually declined thereafter by three months. In the course of longer follow-up, the layer of the in-stent hypodense area (neointimal hyperplasia) continued to grow in size for up to 24 months. Patients with an in-stent hypodense area at two weeks have a thicker layer of neointimal hyperplasia at 24 months than patients without in-stent hypodense area at two weeks' follow-up. The predictive factors for growing neointimal hyperplasia at 24 months in multiple regression analysis are ulcer formation in pretreatment stenosis and the thickness of in-stent hypodense area at two weeks following CAS. Conclusion Our results suggest that follow-up study should be continued for a longer period even if in-stent restenosis could not be detected at one year following CAS. Especially in cases with ulcer formation in pretreatment stenosis and with a subacute in-stent hypodense area after CAS, longer follow-up is strongly recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamashita et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: