Key result
Superb microvascular imaging identified in-stent restenosis in 1 of 9 affected patients who had no velocity increase on standard Doppler ultrasound.
Why the study?
In-stent restenosis due to neointimal hyperplasia can develop after CAS, prompting evaluation of whether superb microvascular imaging improves visualization and detection compared with B-mode and Doppler US.
Does superb microvascular imaging (SMI) improve the detection of in-stent restenosis compared to Doppler ultrasound in patients who underwent carotid artery stenting?
Observational (n=44)
No
Does superb microvascular imaging (SMI) improve the detection of in-stent restenosis compared to Doppler ultrasound in patients who underwent carotid artery stenting?
Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) combined with duplex sonography may improve the detection of neointimal hyperplasia and in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting compared to Doppler ultrasound alone.
May enhance restenosis detection beyond Doppler in select cases; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
BackgroundCarotid artery stenting (CAS) is an interventional management in preventing ischemic stroke caused by carotid artery stenosis. After the treatment with CAS, in-stent restenosis caused by neointimal hyperplasia may develop.PurposeThis study aims to obtain a better determination of neointimal hyperplasia using superb microvascular imaging (SMI), which provides a high-quality visualization of the endoluminal lesions, and to compare these results with B-mode and Doppler ultrasound (US).Material and MethodsA total of 106 patients who underwent CAS in our interventional radiology unit between 2018 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. In total, 44 patients whose procedure images and post-procedural follow-up Doppler US and SMI data could be accessed were included.ResultsThere were nine patients who had in-stent restenosis. One patient had no velocity increase; however, on SMI the measurements showed in-stent restenosis both in area and diameter. The other eight patients had a stenosis degree in the range of 50%-79% on Doppler US. Five patients had in-stent restenosis, both in Doppler US and SMI, by area and diameter measurements. Two patients underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA).ConclusionWe suggest that using SMI with duplex sonography improves detecting neointimal hyperplasia and in-stent restenosis. With SMI, better visualization of the stent lumen may improve the patient selection for DSA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keskin et al. (2025) conducted an observational in In-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting (n=44). Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) vs. B-mode and Doppler ultrasound was evaluated on Detection of in-stent restenosis. Superb microvascular imaging identified in-stent restenosis in 1 of 9 affected patients who had no velocity increase on standard Doppler ultrasound.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: