Observational study reveals that marine diet and higher trophic level increase blood mercury in breeding seabirds, indicating that foraging habitat dictates toxic exposure.
Mercury (Hg) is a non-essential element that bioaccumulates and biomagnifies in food webs through site-specific biogeochemical processes. Seabirds are valuable bioindicators of Hg contamination, yet certain regions, like the Portuguese coast, remain underrepresented. This study measured Hg concentrations in the blood of yellow-legged gulls ( Larus michahellis ), Audouin’s gulls ( Ichthyaetus audouinii ), and Cory’s shearwaters ( Calonectris borealis ) breeding along the Portuguese coastline. The influence of foraging ecology on Hg contamination was investigated using stable isotopes ( δ 13 C, δ 15 N, δ 34 S) along with GPS-loggers. Thus, 52 % of the adults were at low risk (0.95–4.8 μg g −1 dry weight, dw), while 37 % were at moderate risk of Hg toxicity (>4.8 μg g −1 dw). The highest trophic positions (indicated by δ 15 N values) were associated with higher Hg concentrations, particularly in gulls from Deserta Island. Yellow-legged gulls foraging in terrestrial habitats (inferred from lower δ 13 C and δ 34 S values and GPS data) generally exhibited lower Hg concentrations, although patterns varied between regions. Gulls from Deserta Island had elevated Hg concentrations, likely because they feed on discarded demersal fish . In contrast, those from Porto showed some of the lowest concentrations, likely because they fed on terrestrial food. However, other factors not evaluated here, like age, sex, or even phylogeny could have also influenced Hg uptake and bioaccumulation and should not be disregarded in future research. This study highlights the critical role of foraging strategies in Hg contamination and stresses the importance of estimate food web-specific baseline isotopic composition to better understand how these differences may impact Hg trophic transfer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: