Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The isolobal displacement reaction of tetrahedral cluster (μ 3 -S)FeCo 2 (CO) 9 with isolobal reagents η 5 -Ph 2 PC 5 H 4 (CO) 3 MLi (M = Mo, W) in THF at about 60 °C was found to give the μ-η 1:η 5 -Ph 2 PC 5 H 4 -containing tetrahedral clusters (μ-η 1:η 5 -Ph 2 PC 5 H 4 )(μ 3 -S)MFeCo(CO) 7 ( 1, M = Mo; 2, M = W), whereas tetrahedral clusters (μ 3 -RC)Co 3 (CO) 9 (R = Me, Ph) reacted with η 5 -Ph 2 PC 5 H 4 (CO) 3 MLi under the same conditions to afford the corresponding tetrahedral clusters (μ-η 1:η 5 -Ph 2 PC 5 H 4 )(μ 3 -MeC)MCo 2 (CO) 7 ( 3, M = Mo; 4, M = W) and (μ-η 1:η 5 -Ph 2 PC 5 H 4 )(μ 3 -PhC)MCo 2 (CO) 7 ( 5, M = Mo; 6, M = W). However, it was found that when tetrahedral cluster CpMoCo 3 (CO) 11 reacted with isolobal reagent η 5 -Ph 2 PC 5 H 4 (CO) 3 MoLi under similar conditions, the corresponding tetrahedral cluster (μ-η 1:η 5 -Ph 2 PC 5 H 4 )CpMo 2 Co 2 (CO) 9 ( 7 ) was not produced, but instead the dinuclear complex (μ-η 1:η 5 -Ph 2 PC 5 H 4 )CpMo 2 (CO) 5 ( 8 ) was obtained unexpectedly. While 1 − 6 and 8 have been characterized by elemental analysis and spectroscopy, as well as by X-ray crystallography for 1 − 3 and 8, the possible pathways for formation of these products are suggested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: