This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Four promising iodine “getter” materials (Ag, Cu, Bi, and Sn) for radioiodine capture were assessed in their pure metal-iodide ( M I x ) pelletized forms to compare relative chemical durabilities. To study chemical durability, commercial M I x compounds of AgI, BiI 3, BiOI, CuI, and SnI 4 were converted to dense monolithic pellets using spark plasma sintering. Semidynamic leach testing in the form of modified ASTM C1308 tests was then performed on the pellets in two different forms including unmounted (as-pressed) specimens (i.e., “U”) and epoxy-mounted specimens (i.e., “M”) with polished surfaces. The chemical durability results and sample characterizations showed that three of the five M I x compounds tested (i.e., AgI, CuI, and BiOI) displayed moderate to high leach resistances. The remaining two M I x compounds (i.e., BiI 3 and SnI 4 ), which are both desirable iodine waste forms due to their high iodine loading capacities, readily decomposed during leach testing, indicated by crystallographic changes in the specimens as well as large amounts of iodine detected in the leachate solutions. The instabilities of BiI 3 and SnI 4 raise uncertainties for using the base metals/cations (i.e., Bi 0 /Bi 3+ and Sn 0 /Sn 4+, respectively) as viable getters for radioiodine capture due to likely poor waste form chemical durabilities after capture and consolidation into waste forms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oshiro et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: