Why the study?
Does infarct-related artery patency improve long-term survival in patients with anterior AMI and poor myocardial viability?
Does infarct-related artery patency improve long-term survival in patients with anterior AMI and poor myocardial viability?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Infarct-related artery patency is associated with improved long-term survival and left ventricular function in anterior AMI patients, even when myocardial viability in the risk region is poor.
BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated the benefit of the patency of infarct-related artery (IRA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However those studies have not been concerned with myocardial viability in the region-at-risk. In the present study the effect of the patency of IRA was investigated in the setting of anterior AMI with poor viable myocardium in the risk region. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 1993 to 1996 patients with a first time anterior AMI and poor viable myocardium in the region-at-risk at 1 month after onset were identified and enrolled. Patients with a totally occluded IRA were included in the Non-Open group (n=44), and patients with a reperfused IRA were included in the Open group (n=49). At 5 years after onset, left ventricular function was better preserved in the Open group than in the Non-Open group (p<0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for cardiac mortality and event-free survival curves revealed poor prognoses in the Non-Open group over a 5-year period (p<0.05, respectively). The advantages of a patent IRA were further seen in health-related quality-of-life outcomes (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Even in patients with poor myocardial viability after an anterior AMI, the patency of the IRA is strongly associated with improved long-term survival, independent of residual myocardium viability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukuda et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: