Why the study?
How does normal pregnancy alter echocardiographic parameters of cardiac structure and function in Nigerian women compared to nonpregnant controls?
How does normal pregnancy alter echocardiographic parameters of cardiac structure and function in Nigerian women compared to nonpregnant controls?
Normal pregnancy in Nigerian women is associated with significant but physiological increases in cardiac chamber dimensions, LV mass, and systolic/diastolic function indices compared to nonpregnant controls.
May reflect normal pregnancy physiology in Nigerian women; hypothesis-generating for ethnic-specific echocardiographic norms.
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy is a physiological process associated with an increased hemodynamic load and cardiac structural remodeling. Limited echocardiographic information exists on cardiac chambers, left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic functions, and LV mass during trimesters of normal pregnancy among African women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Echocardiography was done at the beginning of the second trimester, beginning of the third trimester, and middle of the third trimester for 100 normal pregnant women and at one visit for age-matched 100 nonpregnant women. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17 software. Analysis of variance was used to compare within trimesters, and a P value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The mean (SD) ages of the patients and controls were 28.20 (±5.91) and 28.35 (±6.06) years, respectively (age range = 19-44 years, P = 0.86). Cardiac chambers, LV systolic function, and LV mass and its index increased significantly during pregnancy. A significant increase in A-wave velocity but slight increase in E-wave velocity and a reduction in tissue e' velocity at the septal margin but a progressive increase in a' velocity were also observed (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Cardiac chamber dimensions, LV wall thickness, and mass, most indices of LV systolic and diastolic function, though within normal range, were significantly higher in pregnant than in nonpregnant Nigerian women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adeyeye et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: