This study investigates the adsorption configurations and the dissociative reactions of HN 3 on the TiO 2 anatase (101) surface by first-principles calculations. The results show that there are six different adsorption configurations of HN 3 adsorbed on the surface. Among those adsorption configurations, the most stable adsorbate configuration is side-on HN(N 2 )−Ti(a), with an adsorption energy of 10.2 kcal/mol. In addition, for the HN 3 fragments, the most stable adsorbate is Ti−(H)N−O(a), with an adsorption energy of 69.8 kcal/mol. The effect of the H present in the coadsorbed configuration significantly increases the adsorption energy by 46.4, 44.2, and 49.2 kcal/mol for the adsorbates of N 3 −Ti(a), Ti−N 3 −O(a), and Ti−N 3 −Ti(a), respectively. The lowest two energy levels for dissociative adsorbates are Ti−(H)N−O(a) + N 2 −Ti(a) and N 3 −Ti(a) a + H−O(a), and their energies are 5.7 and −12.8 kcal/mol, respectively. In addition, for the latter dissociative adsorbates, the two lowest energy barriers for these adsorbates that transit from their initial end-to-end Ti−N 3 H···O*(a) and end-to-end Ti−N 3 H−O(a) are approximately 2.6 kcal/mol. The comparison made between HN 3 on both anatase and rutile surfaces shows that the reactions of dissociative adsorptions of HN 3 are endothermic for Ti−(H)N−O(a) + N 2 −Ti(a) and exothermic for N 3 −Ti(a) a + O−H(a) on the anatase (101) surface, while both are exothermic on the rutile (110) surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: