Why the study?
Endovascular treatment in orally anticoagulated patients had not been evaluated in randomized clinical trials, and data regarding this issue were sparse.
Does endovascular treatment have similar safety and efficacy in orally anticoagulated patients compared to non-anticoagulated patients with LVO stroke?
Does endovascular treatment have similar safety and efficacy in orally anticoagulated patients compared to non-anticoagulated patients with LVO stroke?
Endovascular treatment for large vessel occlusion stroke appears safe and effective in patients on prior oral anticoagulation, with no increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared to non-anticoagulated patients.
May proceed with ET in OAC LVO stroke; leaves open residual confounding for functional recovery.
BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment (ET) in orally anticoagulated (OAC) patients has not been evaluated in randomized clinical trials and data regarding this issue are sparse. METHODS: We analyzed data from the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment (GSR-ET; NCT03356392, date of registration: 22 Nov 2017). The primary outcomes were successful reperfusion defined as modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI 2b-3), good outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0-2 or back to baseline), and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on follow-up imaging at 24 h analyzed by unadjusted univariate and adjusted binary logistic regression analysis. Additionally, we analyzed mortality at 3 months with adjusted binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Out of 6173 patients, there were 1306 (21.2%) OAC patients, 479 (7.8%) with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and 827 (13.4%) with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulation (NOAC). The control group consisted of 4867 (78.8%) non-OAC patients. ET efficacy with the rates of mTICI 2b-3 was similar among the three groups (85.6%, 85.3% vs 84.3%, p = 0.93 and 1). On day 90, good outcome was less frequent in OAC patients (27.8%, 27.9% vs 39.5%, p < 0.005 and < 0.005). OAC status was not associated with ICH at 24 h (NOAC: odd's ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.20; VKA: OR 1.04, CI 0.75-1.46). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed no influence of OAC status on good outcome at 3 months (NOAC: OR 1.25, CI 0.99-1.59; VKA: OR 1.18, CI 0.89-1.56) and mortality at 3 months (NOAC: OR 1.03, CI 0.81-1.30; VKA: OR 1.04, CI 0.78-1.1.37). CONCLUSIONS: ET can be performed safely and successfully in LVO stroke patients treated with OAC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03356392.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Küpper et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: