Why the study?
Prior studies on adherence and persistence with NOAC treatment relied on data from the early years of NOAC availability.
Does non-persistence or poor adherence to NOACs increase the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does non-persistence or poor adherence to NOACs increase the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation?
In patients with atrial fibrillation, non-persistence and poor adherence to NOACs are associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke and TIA.
Should not yet change NOAC monitoring practice; leaves open whether persistence interventions reduce stroke in AF.
AIMS: Studies on adherence and persistence with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment have relied on data from the early years of NOAC availability. We aimed to study long-term adherence and persistence with NOACs and their association with stroke risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: From the Stockholm Healthcare database, we included 21 028 atrial fibrillation patients claiming a first NOAC prescription from July 2011 until October 2018, with more than 1000 patients having more than 5 years of follow-up (median: 2.0, interquartile range: 1.0-3.2). Persistence rates, defined as continuing to claim NOAC prescriptions within a 90-day gap, decreased to 70% at the end of follow-up. However, 85% of the patients were treated at the end of the study due to reinitiations. Adherence, calculated as medication possession rate (MPR) in 3 and 6-month intervals among persistent users, remained stable at 90%, with 75% of patients having an MPR >95% throughout the study period. Using a case-control design, we calculated associations of persistence and adherence with stroke risk, adjusting for potential confounders. The outcome was a composite of ischaemic or unspecified stroke and transient ischaemic attack. Non-persistence and poor adherence were both associated with increased stroke risk [non-persistence adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49-2.82, 1% reduction MPR aOR: 1.03; CI: 1.01-1.05]. There was no association between non-persistence or poor adherence and the falsification endpoints; fractions and respiratory infections, indicating no 'healthy-adherer' effect. CONCLUSION: Persistence rates decreased slowly over time, but persistent patients had high adherence rates. Both non-persistence and poor adherence were associated with an increased stroke risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Komen et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: