Experimental evaluation demonstrates improved high-difficulty reading comprehension in LLMs fine-tuned on intermediate data, indicating strong cross-task generalization in open-source models.
To rigorously evaluate the advanced reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in machine reading comprehension (MRC) within professional English linguistic domains, we introduce a novel high-difficulty benchmark, Advanced English Reading Comprehension (AERC). This dataset is domain-specific, constructed from expert-level English examinations (TEM8, CATTI). Comparative experiments show that 12 state-of-the-art LLMs perform, on average, 8.61% worse on AERC than on RACE, confirming the substantially higher complexity of the proposed benchmark. To further examine cross-task generalization in MRC, we fine-tune six LLMs on RACE using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA). The results indicate consistent performance improvements on AERC, although increasing the size of the training set does not necessarily yield the best transfer outcomes. Notably, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct, when fine-tuned on a 60% subset of RACE, attains an accuracy of 86.53% on AERC, exceeding that of GPT-4o (83.87%) despite its considerably smaller parameter scale. Overall, the findings demonstrate that lower-difficulty training data can enhance generalization to more challenging MRC tasks in English. They also highlight the potential of well-fine-tuned open-source models to outperform leading commercial LLMs in cognitively demanding reading comprehension scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: