Scenario modeling study reveals sectoral cost disparities and spatial energy mismatches in Chinese industries under carbon border taxes, indicating a need for phased clean technology deployment.
The Carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) is reshaping the cost structure and competitive landscape of global energy-intensive industries, creating an urgent need for strategic decision-making on technology pathways in China’s export-oriented sectors. This study develops an integrated analytical framework to evaluate technology competitiveness across carbon price scenarios and project provincial energy demand shifts in four CBAM-covered industries: crude steel, aluminum smelting, cement clinker, and synthetic ammonia. The results reveal substantial heterogeneity across sectors. At current EU carbon price levels, secondary aluminum demonstrates negative abatement costs, while scrap-based steel approaches viability as prices rise. In contrast, cement CCS exceeds foreseeable carbon price levels, and green hydrogen routes remain costly under current conditions. Provincial energy demand analysis uncovers a fundamental spatial mismatch: traditional industrial heartlands dominate energy consumption yet have carbon-intensive grids and limited renewable resources. Despite dramatic coal demand reductions under rising carbon prices, geographic concentration remains stable, underscoring path-dependent industrial location. This study suggests phased response strategies: prioritizing circular economy technologies where economics is favorable, accelerating CCS deployment as costs decline, and coordinating industrial relocation with clean energy infrastructure to address spatial mismatches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Di et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: