The fiscal–monetary–inflation system does not operate as a coherent long-run structure in Bangladesh over 1973–2025. Using a five-link framework tested via autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bounds estimation, Bai–Perron structural break tests, regime-specific Granger causality, and a four-variable VAR, we report three findings. First, the system is temporally fragmented: the long-run association between money growth and inflation is 0.389 (p < .01) before the 1991 trade liberalisation and statistically indistinguishable from zero thereafter, the post-1991 effect being −0.010 with a standard error of 0.113. Second, the fiscal deficit–currency growth relationship becomes negative after the 2003 float, moving from +0.32 in 1973–1990 to −2.87 (p < .05) in 2004–2025; larger deficits are associated with slower currency growth, consistent with non-monetary deficit financing rather than textbook seigniorage. Regime-invariance tests do not reject parameter stability in this equation, so we describe the pattern as exploratory. Third, exchange-rate pass-through shifts significantly at the 2003 float (slope shift 1.090, p = .047), though post-float pass-through of 0.282 is imprecisely estimated. Bangladesh’s monetary aggregates ceased to co-move with prices before the recent inflation episode, which helps explain why monetary tightening has produced limited disinflationary effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sayedur et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: