Prospective observational study reveals repositioning increases cuff pressure and agitation triggers out-of-range spikes in ventilated patients, highlighting the need for prompt reassessment.
Background:Endotracheal tube cuff pressure may fluctuate during routine intensive care unit (ICU) care despite standard monitoring.We evaluated short-term cuff pressure changes after repositioning according to measurement time, patient position, sedation level, and body mass index. Material/Methods:This prospective observational study included 103 mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients.Before repositioning, cuff pressure was adjusted to 20 to 30 cm H 2 O when necessary, and the resulting value was recorded as T0.Patients were placed in the head-elevated supine, right lateral, or left lateral position.Cuff pressure was remeasured at 1 (T1) and 5 (T2) minutes after repositioning.Repeated measurements obtained during routine positioning cycles over a 2-day period were analyzed via mixed-effects models.Results:In total, 4944 cuff pressure measurements were analyzed.Cuff pressure significantly increased over time, from 27.67 ± 2.27 cm H 2 O at T0 to 28.11 ± 2.89 cm H 2 O at T1 and 28.29 ± 3.23 cm H 2 O at T2 (P < 0.001); the absolute magnitude of change was small.No significant differences were detected among target positions (P > 0.05).Higher Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores were independently associated with increased cuff pressure (b = 0.94 cm H 2 O per 1-point increase; P < 0.001) and higher odds of out-of-range cuff pressure (odds ratio, 7.21; P < 0.001). Conclusions:Endotracheal tube cuff pressure showed statistically significant short-term changes after repositioning.Higher RASS scores were associated with greater cuff pressure variability and higher odds of out-of-range cuff pressure.Repeated cuff pressure reassessment after repositioning may be beneficial, particularly in patients with higher RASS scores or greater agitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gülen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: