Systematic review reveals natural language processing in psychosis records lacks external validation, highlighting gaps between proof-of-concept models and real-world clinical utility.
Natural language processing (NLP) enables the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for psychosis research in real-world settings and develops precision psychiatry. We conducted a PRISMA-guided systematic review of five databases from inception to 9 October 2025 and identified 62 eligible studies with over 1 million participants. Most studies (62.9%) used data from the UK Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) platform. Methodologically, 37.1% applied dictionary-based NLP, 53.2% representation-based machine learning, 9.7% transformer-based NLP, and none applied generative large language models (LLMs). Clinically, 74.2% targeted symptom/information extraction, 19.2% classification, and 16.1% risk prediction. However, 56.5% studies self-reported limited generalizability, 32.3% reported data quality/collection challenges, and only two studies performed external validation. Despite promising proof-of-concept performance, evidence of real-world clinical utility remains limited. Current work remains concentrated on retrospective phenotyping within a single healthcare ecosystem. We highlight priorities for multi-system validation, temporal trajectory modeling, and responsible LLMs deployment in psychosis EHRs research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: