Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Social network analysis reveals increasing centralization of donor–beneficiary ties in local philanthropy, suggesting risks to sector diversity and inclusivity.
In Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, post-socialist countries local philanthropy is gaining importance as external aid diminishes. This paper examines the changing structure of these local giving ecosystems between 2015 and 2022. Social network analysis is used to map the relationships between donors and beneficiaries, treating each donation as a relational tie rather than as a financial flow, and examining the structure of giving rather than its volume. Key metrics tracking network centralization, but also density and cliquishness, showed changes over the years. There is a significant trend towards network centralization in both countries: philanthropic activity is increasingly concentrated around fewer central entities, potentially marginalizing smaller groups. While number of connections generally increased, dense collaborative clusters did not strengthen uniformly. Consolidation presents potential efficiencies alongside risks for the sector’s diversity and inclusivity. This paper provides an empirical basis for designing strategies that counnteract centralization and support a more distributed local giving ecosystem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galjak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: