Multicenter cohort study reveals distinct chemo-immunotherapy responses across rare triple-negative breast cancer subtypes, highlighting the need for histology-specific treatment strategies.
Special histologic subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are biologically distinct, yet their outcomes in the immunotherapy era remain undefined. We analyzed 823 patients with early-stage TNBC treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in the multicenter real-world Neo-Real/GBECAM-0123 cohort. Histologies included invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST; n = 762, 92.6%), metaplastic carcinoma ( n = 26, 3.2%), triple-negative lobular carcinoma ( n = 17, 2.1%), and other rare variants ( n = 18, 2.2%). Metaplastic carcinoma demonstrated significantly lower pathological complete response (pCR) rates compared with NST (17.4% vs 65.4%; OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04–0.44; p = 0.001), suggesting relative resistance to chemo-immunotherapy, with a numerical trend toward worse event-free survival (EFS) (HR 2.07, 95% CI 0.88–4.88; p = 0.094). Triple-negative lobular carcinoma achieved pCR rates comparable to NST (56.2%) but showed poorer 2-year EFS, with a significant association in the pre-surgical multivariable model (HR 4.25, 95% CI 1.50–12.06; p = 0.006), and a persistent trend after adjustment for pCR. This highlights the biological heterogeneity of TNBC and supports the investigation of histology-driven therapeutic strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barroso-Sousa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: