Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Representations of temporal networks arising from a stream of edges lie at the heart of models learned on it and its performance on downstream applications. Previous modeling work has mainly represented a stream of timestamped edges using a time-series of graphs based on a specific time-scaleτ(e.g., 1 mo). In contrast, it has recently been shown that constructing a time-series of graphs where each graph maintains a fixedεnumber of edges, namelyε-graph time-series, leads to better performance on downstream applications, but there has yet to be a detailed investigation on whyε-graphs outperformτ-graphs. In this work, we design extensive experiments on a benchmark of over 25 temporal network datasets, investigating the impact of edge randomization and the various representations on graph statistics. Our results indicate that theε-graph time-series representation effectively captures the structural properties of the graphs across time whereas the commonly usedτ-graph time-series mostly captures the frequency of edges. This motivates the need for a paradigm shift to developing temporal network representation learning frameworks built uponε-graph time-series. To help pave the way, we release a benchmark for the evaluation and development of better models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: