Cross-sectional study shows environmental health literacy strongly predicts PM2.5 preventive behaviors in village health volunteers, suggesting a key target for pollution training programs.
This study assessed environmental health literacy and its association with PM2.5-related preventive behaviors among 414 village health volunteers (VHVs) in Samut Songkhram Province, Thailand. A cross-sectional study was conducted from June to December 2025. Participants were selected using multistage sampling, and data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analysis were performed. Overall environmental health literacy was moderate (M = 3.57, SD = 0.59), whereas preventive behaviors were high (M = 3.77, SD = 0.66). In the adjusted model, environmental health literacy was positively associated with preventive behavior scores and had the largest standardized regression coefficient (B = 0.518, 95% CI: 0.449–0.587, β = 0.619, p < 0.001). Age was also positively associated with preventive behavior scores (B = 0.190, 95% CI: 0.073–0.308, β = 0.159, p = 0.002). The model explained 36.8% of the variance in preventive behavior scores (R² = 0.368, adjusted R² = 0.354), whereas the other sociodemographic factors were not significantly associated with the outcome. Overall environmental health literacy may be considered a candidate target for evaluation in future training and risk communication interventions. However, the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference. Longitudinal and intervention-based studies are needed to determine whether improvements in environmental health literacy lead to changes in preventive behaviors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Songsin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: