PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 14, 2026Journal of OptometryOpen Access

Diagnostic accuracy of objective measures for ocular malingering: A systematic review

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

EAEmmanuel Ekow AmpiahPAPatrick Evans AgyiriGOGideon Owusu

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Systematic review demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy of objective tests for ocular malingering, indicating strong utility for clinical and medico-legal visual assessments.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of objective testing modalities, including visual evoked potentials, pupillometry, and eye-tracking, in identifying fabricated visual impairment.
  • Conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library through June 2025.
  • Extracted diagnostic accuracy metrics and evaluated risk of bias using QUADAS-2 across 10 included studies published between 1993 and 2017 (sample sizes N=20 to N=222).
  • Visual evoked potentials (VEP) were the most evaluated tool and demonstrated high sensitivity across studies, with pattern-reversal VEP effective in adults and military conscripts, and step VEP achieving 100% specificity in pediatric cohorts.
  • Pupillometry and specialized color vision testing modalities achieved sensitivity and specificity rates ranging from 80% to 94%.
  • Most studies displayed a low risk of bias regarding index tests and reference standards, although methodological heterogeneity limits broad generalizability.

Cite This Study

Ampiah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7ec78db70b84ec8b914005https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2026.100621
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share