Mixed-methods community study uncovers strong individual and collective hope among rural residents, highlighting shared vision and civic engagement as key drivers of community resilience.
Sociologists have long used a deficit view in their work. However, some sociologists have recently turned to positive emotions, such as joy and hope, to provide a more complete view of marginalized and other populations. Largely, rural sociologists have not made the turn toward positive emotions. Rural places in the Western United States have been of interest to sociologists due to historical and contemporary social, economic, and demographic change. By focusing on these changes, sociologists have often geared their research toward how rural places are struggling and the conflict among residents. I suggest that there is a more complete view of rural places that includes hope. Using data from semi‐structured interviews, a drop‐off/pickup survey, and 2 years spent living in Beaverhead County, Montana, I found that residents of Beaverhead County appear to have both collective and individual hope for the future. My research indicates that central to this hope is a shared vision for the community's future and collective engagement in creating a place that residents want to live. Considering this, I suggest that researchers should follow the work of positive psychologists and environmental sociologists by integrating hope as a lens to view and understand rural places in their research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elizabeth A. Bennett (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: