Preclinical study reveals enhanced antitumor efficacy using repurposed loratadine and simvastatin with gefitinib in cervical cancer models, suggesting reduced chemotherapy toxicity.
Background/Objectives: Cervical cancer (CC) is the most clinically significant HPV-associated malignancy. Platinum-based chemotherapies produce drug resistance and serious adverse effects. Drug repurposing and combinations are promising approaches to improve the antitumor response. Here, we evaluated the antineoplastic potential of loratadine and simvastatin alone and in combination with cisplatin and gefitinib in HPV-positive CC cells. Methods: HeLa and SiHa CC cells were treated with loratadine, simvastatin, cisplatin, gefitinib, or their combinations. Metabolic activity was assessed using the MTT assay to determine drug inhibitory concentrations (IC20, IC50) from concentration–response curves. Apoptosis was assessed by Annexin V-FITC/PI flow cytometry. Clonogenic survival and migratory capacity were evaluated using colony formation and wound-healing assays, respectively. Tumor formation was evaluated in vivo using the chick chorioallantoic membrane model. Results: Metabolic activity decreased in a concentration-dependent manner following drug treatment in both cell lines. Several combination regimens at IC20 significantly improved reductions in metabolic activity and increases in apoptosis compared with monotherapies or two-drug combinations. Notably, some three-drug combinations, with or without cisplatin, had similar effects to the quadruple regimen. Combination treatments also reduced clonogenic survival and migratory capacity, as well as tumor formation and cancer cell dissemination in vivo. Conclusions: Drug combinations at relatively low concentrations (IC20) significantly enhanced the anticancer effects on CC cells in in vitro and in vivo settings. These findings support the potential of drug repurposing and combination strategies as promising approaches to decrease adverse side effects while improving therapeutic efficacy for the benefit of CC patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raya-Bahena et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: