Why the study?
In endovascular treatment for acute large vessel occlusion stroke-related intracranial atherosclerosis disease, reocclusion of the recanalized artery due to in situ thrombosis is problematic.
Does prasugrel administration improve target vessel patency and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing emergent endovascular treatment for acute large vessel occlusion stroke-related intracranial atherosclerosis disease?
Does prasugrel administration improve target vessel patency and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing emergent endovascular treatment for acute large vessel occlusion stroke-related intracranial atherosclerosis disease?
Prasugrel administration during emergent endovascular treatment for stroke-related intracranial atherosclerosis disease may safely improve target vessel patency and clinical outcomes.
Prasugrel may improve patency after endovascular therapy for ICAD-related LVO; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Objective: Intracranial atherosclerosis disease (ICAD) is one of the most common causes of acute ischemic stroke. In endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute large vessel occlusion stroke-related ICAD, reocclusion of the recanalized artery due to in situ thrombosis is problematic. In this study, the safety and efficacy of prasugrel administration to avoid reocclusion of emergent EVT for ICAD was investigated. Methods: ). Target vessel patency on follow-up, postprocedural intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and clinical outcome were compared between PSG and non-PSG groups. Results: A total of 27 procedures were included in this analysis. Nineteen target vessels were patent on follow-up and eight were non-patent. Fifteen patients received prasugrel (18.75 mg: 11 cases, 11.25 mg: 4 cases), and twelve patients did not receive prasugrel. The target vessel patency rate was better in the PSG group vs. non-PSG group (100% vs. 33.3%, respectively; p = 0.0002). The postprocedural ICH rate was not different between the groups (PSG: 40.0% vs. non-PSG: 25.0%; p = 0.68), and all ICHs were asymptomatic. Good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 3 at discharge) was more frequent in the PSG group than that in the non-PSG group (66.7% vs. 16.7%, respectively; p = 0.019). Conclusion: Prasugrel administration was significantly associated with target vessel patency and good clinical outcome after emergent EVT for ICAD without increasing the symptomatic ICH rate. Prasugrel administration might be safe and effective to avoid reocclusion during and after emergent EVT for ICAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asai et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: