Why the study?
Does a reduction in postoperative length of stay increase the 30-day readmission rate in Medicare patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery?
Does a reduction in postoperative length of stay increase the 30-day readmission rate in Medicare patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery?
A reduction in postoperative length of stay after coronary bypass surgery is associated with an increased risk of 30-day readmission when accounting for unobserved confounding.
Shorter postoperative LOS after CABG may increase 30-day readmissions; leaves open causality and requires prospective trials before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: : To determine the effect of postoperative length of stay (LOS) on 30-day readmission after coronary artery bypass surgery. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: : We analyzed a final database consisting of Medicare claims of a cohort (N=157,070) of all fee-for-service beneficiaries undergoing bypass surgery during 2007-2008, the American Hospital Association annual survey file, and the rural urban commuting area file. STUDY DESIGN: : We regressed the probability of 30-day readmission on postoperative LOS using (1) a (naive) logit model that controlled for observed patient and hospital covariates only; and (2) a residual inclusion instrumental variable (IV) logit model that further controlled for unobserved confounding. The IV was defined using a measure of the hospital's risk-adjusted LOS for patients admitted for gastrointestinal hemorrhage. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: : The naive logit model predicted that a 1-day reduction in median postoperative LOS (ie, from a median of 6-5 d) lowered the 30-day readmission rate by 2 percentage points. The IV model predicted that a 1-day reduction in median postoperative LOS increased 30-day readmission rate by 3 percentage points. CONCLUSIONS: : The findings indicate that a reduction in postoperative LOS is associated with an increased risk for 30-day readmission among Medicare patients undergoing bypass surgery, after both observed and unobserved confounding effects are corrected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: