Mixed-methods study reveals high awareness but selective enactment of children's rights among teachers, highlighting the need for context-sensitive professional development.
This study examines teachers’ awareness of children’s rights in Türkiye and how they report translating this awareness into classroom practice. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, quantitative data were collected from 1,918 public-school teachers, followed by semi-structured interviews with 17 teachers. Teachers reported high awareness of children’s rights, but their accounts indicated uneven enactment across practice dimensions. Protection-oriented practices, including safety, digital-risk prevention, and harm prevention, were reported more readily, whereas participation rights and responses to rights violations were less frequent and more context-dependent. This pattern of selective enactment was shaped by classroom conditions, curriculum demands, examination pressures, and family influences. Moving beyond a simple awareness–practice gap, the study conceptualizes selective enactment as a process through which teachers interpret, filter, and operationalize different dimensions of children’s rights within contextual constraints. Findings underscore the need for practice-oriented, context-sensitive professional development and stronger participatory pedagogies to support balanced rights-based education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: