Key result
Impella was associated with a statistically significantly lower rate of ischemic stroke compared to VA-ECMO in adult patients with cardiogenic shock.
Why the study?
Impella and VA-ECMO are therapeutic courses for cardiogenic shock, but comprehensive systematic review and meta-analyses of clinical and socio-economic outcomes were needed.
Does Impella improve clinical and socio-economic outcomes compared to VA-ECMO in adult patients with cardiogenic shock?
Meta-Analysis
Does Impella improve clinical and socio-economic outcomes compared to VA-ECMO in adult patients with cardiogenic shock?
In patients with cardiogenic shock, Impella is associated with a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke compared to VA-ECMO, though data on socio-economic outcomes remain lacking.
May favor Impella over VA-ECMO to lower ischemic stroke in cardiogenic shock; leaves open effects on mortality and costs.
Impella and VA-ECMO are two possible therapeutic courses for the treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). The study aims to perform a systematic literature review and meta-analyses of a comprehensive set of clinical and socio-economic outcomes observed when using Impella or VA-ECMO with patients under CS. A systematic literature review was performed in Medline, and Web of Science databases on 21 February 2022. Nonoverlapping studies with adult patients supported for CS with Impella or VA-ECMO were searched. Study designs including RCTs, observational studies, and economic evaluations were considered. Data on patient characteristics, type of support, and outcomes were extracted. Additionally, meta-analyses were performed on the most relevant and recurring outcomes, and results shown using forest plots. A total of 102 studies were included, 57% on Impella, 43% on VA-ECMO. The most common outcomes investigated were mortality/survival, duration of support, and bleeding. Ischemic stroke was lower in patients treated with Impella compared to the VA-ECMO population, with statistically significant difference. Socio-economic outcomes including quality of life or resource use were not reported in any study. The study highlighted areas where further data collection is needed to clarify the value of complex, new technologies in the treatment of CS that will enable comparative assessments focusing both on the health impact on patient outcomes and on the financial burden for government budgets. Future studies need to fill the gap to comply with recent regulatory updates at the European and national levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ardito et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Cardiogenic shock. Impella vs. VA-ECMO was evaluated on Ischemic stroke. Impella was associated with a statistically significantly lower rate of ischemic stroke compared to VA-ECMO in adult patients with cardiogenic shock.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: