Key result
Cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking were significantly associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness, but demonstrated no clinically relevant segment-specific effects.
Why the study?
Guideline recommendations against measuring carotid intima-media thickness for cardiovascular risk prediction rely on single-segment assessments, leaving unclear whether segment-specific associations exist between different measurement locations and cardiovascular risk factors.
Cohort (n=2,492)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A single measurement of carotid intima-media thickness at one location is sufficient for cardiovascular risk assessment, as there is no clinically relevant segment-specific association with traditional risk factors.
BACKGROUND: The guideline recommendation to not measure carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) for cardiovascular risk prediction is based on the assessment of just one single carotid segment. We evaluated whether there is a segment-specific association between different measurement locations of CIMT and cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: Subjects from the population-based STAAB cohort study comprising subjects aged 30 to 79 years of the general population from Würzburg, Germany, were investigated. CIMT was measured on the far wall of both sides in three different predefined locations: common carotid artery (CCA), bulb, and internal carotid artery (ICA). Diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, and obesity were considered as risk factors. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, odds ratios of risk factors per location were estimated for the endpoint of individual age- and sex-adjusted 75th percentile of CIMT. RESULTS: 2492 subjects were included in the analysis. Segment-specific CIMT was highest in the bulb, followed by CCA, and lowest in the ICA. Dyslipidemia, hypertension, and smoking were associated with CIMT, but not diabetes and obesity. We observed no relevant segment-specific association between the three different locations and risk factors, except for a possible interaction between smoking and ICA. CONCLUSIONS: As no segment-specific association between cardiovascular risk factors and CIMT became evident, one simple measurement of one location may suffice to assess the cardiovascular risk of an individual.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Müller-Scholden et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular risk assessment in the general population (n=2,492). Cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking) vs. Absence of respective cardiovascular risk factors was evaluated on Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) value above the age- and sex-adjusted 75th percentile (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.53-2.27). Cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking were significantly associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness, but demonstrated no clinically relevant segment-specific effects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: