Key result
Starting rivaroxaban within 14 days of acute ischemic stroke onset in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation was associated with a significantly lower rate of recurrent ischemic stroke compared to starting at 15 days or later (2.0% vs 6.8%).
Why the study?
The efficacy of early anticoagulation in acute stroke with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation remains unclear.
Does early initiation of rivaroxaban prevent recurrent ischemic stroke without increasing major bleeding in patients with acute ischemic stroke and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=1,309)
Yes
Does early initiation of rivaroxaban prevent recurrent ischemic stroke without increasing major bleeding in patients with acute ischemic stroke and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 2% vs 6.8%
p-value: p=0.0034
Initiation of rivaroxaban within 14 days of acute ischemic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is associated with a low risk of recurrent stroke and major bleeding.
Supports earlier rivaroxaban start after acute stroke in AF; hypothesis-generating and needs randomized confirmation.
The efficacy of early anticoagulation in acute stroke with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) remains unclear. We performed a study to evaluate the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (IS) and major bleeding in acute IS patients with NVAF who started rivaroxaban. This observational study evaluated patients with NVAF and acute IS/transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the middle cerebral arterial territory who started rivaroxaban within 30 days after the index IS/TIA. The primary endpoints were recurrent IS and major bleeding within 90 days after the index IS/TIA. The relationship between the endpoints and the time to start rivaroxaban was evaluated by correlation analysis using cerebral infarct volume, determined by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images within 48 hours of onset of the index IS/TIA. Of 1309 patients analyzed, recurrent IS occurred in 30 (2.3%) and major bleeding in 11 (0.8%) patients. Among patients with known infarct size (N = 1207), those with small (<4.0 cm3), medium (≥4.0 and <22.5 cm3), and large (≥22.5 cm3) infarcts started rivaroxaban a median of 2.9, 2.9, and 5.8 days, respectively, after the index IS/TIA. Recurrent IS was significantly less frequent when starting rivaroxaban ≤14 days versus ≥15 days after IS (2.0% versus 6.8%, P = 0.0034). Incidences of recurrent IS and major bleeding in whom rivaroxaban was started <3 days (N = 584) after IS were also low: 1.5% and 0.7%, respectively. Initiation of rivaroxaban administration in acute IS or TIA was associated with a low recurrence of IS (2.3%), and a low incidence of major bleeding events (0.8%) for 90 days after the index stroke. For the prevention of recurrent attacks in acute IS patients with NVAF, it is feasible to start the administration of rivaroxaban within 14 days of onset. Rivaroxaban started within 3 days of onset may be a feasible treatment option for patients with a small or medium-sized infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yasaka et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Acute ischemic stroke or TIA with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=1,309). Rivaroxaban initiation ≤14 days vs. Rivaroxaban initiation ≥15 days was evaluated on Recurrent ischemic stroke within 90 days (p=0.0034). Starting rivaroxaban within 14 days of acute ischemic stroke onset in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation was associated with a significantly lower rate of recurrent ischemic stroke compared to starting at 15 days or later (2.0% vs 6.8%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: