Why the study?
Does a higher dose of influenza vaccine improve antibody response in healthy ambulatory elderly?
Does a higher dose of influenza vaccine improve antibody response in healthy ambulatory elderly?
Higher doses of split-product influenza vaccine, but not whole virus vaccine, improve antibody responses in the elderly without increasing local or systemic adverse reactions.
May support higher-dose split-product vaccines in elderly; leaves open optimal dosing for whole-virus formulations.
Healthy ambulatory elderly were immunized with increasing doses of the 1984-1985 influenza vaccine formulation. Two types of vaccines, split-product vaccine (SPV) and whole virus vaccine (WVV), were used. Three different doses, 0.5 mL (the standard volume, 1X), or 1.0 mL (2X), and 1.5 mL (3X) of each of the two vaccines were compared. The size of each of the six groups was between 23 and 26 subjects. The mean ages in each of the groups ranged from 71 to 74 years. No difference in local or systemic reaction was noted among the six groups. A dose-response effect was observed for the SPV recipients to the influenza A/Chile/83 (H1N1) strain. The geometric mean hemagglutination inhibition (HI)titer (GMT) was 1:76 after the 3X dose vs 1:38 after the 1X dose (P less than 0.025). To the influenza A/Philippines/82 (H3N2) strain the GMT was 1:70 after the 3X dose vs 1:43 after the 1X dose. A similar trend was noted for the influenza B/USSR/83 strain. A (HI) titer of greater than or equal to 1:40 for all the strains was seen in greater than 70% of the split product vaccine recipients only after the 3X dose. For the WVV recipients, increasing doses did not result in increasing GMT for any of the three vaccine strains. In addition, HI titers greater than or equal to 1:40 were not uniformly seen in greater than 70% of the vaccine recipients at any of the three whole virus vaccine doses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quinnan et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: