Why the study?
Does unfractionated heparin compared to low molecular weight heparin improve inhibition of platelet activation when combined with Gp IIb/IIIa blockers in thrombin-stimulated platelets?
Does unfractionated heparin compared to low molecular weight heparin improve inhibition of platelet activation when combined with Gp IIb/IIIa blockers in thrombin-stimulated platelets?
In an in vitro model, unfractionated heparin was more effective than low molecular weight heparin at inhibiting upstream platelet activation when combined with Gp IIb/IIIa blockers.
Hypothesis-generating for UFH over LMWH with Gp IIb/IIIa blockers; should not change practice.
Objective: To study the effect of unfractionated heparin (UFH) versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in combination with glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa blockers on platelet activation and aggregation. Methods: Washed platelets were stimulated with thrombin in the presence or absence of UFH (monoparin), LMWH (enoxaparin), and a Gp IIb/IIIa blocker (abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban). Results: Although Gp IIb/IIIa antagonists blocked the final common pathway of thrombin induced platelet aggregation, UFH and LMWH were better at blocking upstream platelet activation. UFH was significantly more effective than LMWH at inhibiting P selectin expression (p = 0.001) and platelet derived growth factor release from thrombin activated platelets (p = 0.012). Conclusions: UFH and LMWH exert complementary effects to Gp IIb/IIIa blockers by inhibiting afferent pathways of platelet activation. Coadministration of heparin with Gp IIb/IIIa blockers provides improved protection against persistent platelet activation, thereby improving outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention. Judging from these data, UFH may be more effective in this regard than LMWH, at least in vitro. The use of LMWH in preference to UFH during percutaneous coronary intervention, although initially attractive, may inadequately protect against platelet activation despite the presence of Gp IIb/IIIa blockers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S Aziz (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: