Key result
A 12-week personalized diet based on insulin resistance phenotype did not significantly improve vascular function (p=0.485) in insulin-resistant adults with overweight or obesity.
Why the study?
Does a personalized dietary intervention based on insulin resistance phenotype improve vascular function and cardiovascular risk factors in insulin-resistant adults with overweight or obesity?
RCT (n=119)
randomized
Does a personalized dietary intervention based on insulin resistance phenotype improve vascular function and cardiovascular risk factors in insulin-resistant adults with overweight or obesity?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A 12-week dietary intervention improves cardiometabolic risk markers but not vascular function in insulin-resistant adults, with no added benefit from personalizing the diet based on muscle or liver insulin resistance phenotypes.
AIMS: Individuals with liver insulin-resistant (LIR) or muscle insulin-resistant (MIR) phenotypes may respond differently to dietary interventions. Given the interaction between insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk, this sub-analysis of the PERSON study examined whether a personalized diet according to MIR or LIR phenotypes improves vascular function and cardiovascular disease risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomized 119 participants to a 12-week low-fat, high-protein, high-fibre diet (LFHP; may be optimal for LIR) or Mediterranean diet (high in monounsaturated fat, HMUFA; may be optimal for MIR). Randomization linked the insulin-resistant (IR) phenotype to the proposed optimal diet, leading to PhenoDiet A (MIR-HMUFA and LIR-LFHP) and PhenoDiet B (MIR-LFHP and LIR-HMUFA). Before and after the intervention, vascular function (carotid artery reactivity) and cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and Framingham risk score) were examined. A 7-point oral glucose tolerance test was performed to determine insulin resistance (Matsuda index and HOMA-IR) and disposition index. RESULTS: ), with n = 80 available for the primary outcome of vascular function. Overall, the dietary interventions significantly decreased blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and the Framingham risk score (all p < 0.05), while vascular function was not affected (p = 0.485). Insulin resistance (p ≤ 0.001), but not disposition index (p = 0.362), was significantly improved after intervention. The Matsuda index (p = 0.078) tended to increase more and total cholesterol (p = 0.052) tended to decrease more in PhenoDiet group B than A, but other changes in outcome parameters were not significantly different between PhenoDiet groups. The LFHP diet resulted in more pronounced improvements in cholesterol, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and insulin resistance compared with the HMUFA diet (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A 12-week diet improves metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes, but not vascular function in insulin-resistant adults with overweight or obesity. Whilst the LFHP diet resulted in greater improvements in cardiometabolic risk markers than the HMUFA diet, we found no significant differences between the PhenoDiet groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wanders et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Insulin resistance with overweight or obesity (n=119). PhenoDiet A (phenotype-matched diet) vs. PhenoDiet B (phenotype-mismatched diet) was evaluated on Vascular function (carotid artery reactivity) (p=0.485). A 12-week personalized diet based on insulin resistance phenotype did not significantly improve vascular function (p=0.485) in insulin-resistant adults with overweight or obesity.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: