Key result
Higher finerenone exposure lowers NT-proBNP but fails to significantly reduce cardiovascular events.
Why the study?
Finerenone reduces the risk of heart failure and CV death in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF, but whether these CV risk-reducing effects are dose or exposure dependent was not clear.
Does higher finerenone dose or exposure improve cardiovascular outcomes and affect serum potassium in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction?
RCT (n=6,001)
Randomized
Does higher finerenone dose or exposure improve cardiovascular outcomes and affect serum potassium in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction?
Protocol-guided dose titration of finerenone based on renal function and potassium levels effectively manages hyperkalemia risk while achieving exposures that significantly reduce NT-proBNP in HFmrEF/HFpEF patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Protocol-guided finerenone titration may limit hyperkalemia in HF; leaves open translation to cardiovascular outcomes.
Background Finerenone reduces the risk of heart failure and cardiovascular (CV) death among patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF). Whether the effects of finerenone to reduce CV risk are dose/exposure dependent is not clear. Methods In FINEARTS‐HF, 6001 participants were randomized to finerenone or placebo, where the initial and target dose of finerenone was titrated according to the baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; 10– > 20 mg if baseline eGFR ≤ 60; 20– > 40 mg if > 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) and by serum potassium and changes in eGFR during the trial. We fitted non‐linear mixed‐effects population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and parametric repeated time‐to‐event models to explore the effect of finerenone dose on exposure ( n = 6658 plasma concentration measurements) and exposure on serum potassium ( n = 123 720 measurements), NT‐proBNP ( n = 16 971 measurements) and the primary composite outcome of total heart failure events and CV death ( n = 2366 events). Results The mean eGFR in those with an initial dose of 10 mg and 20 mg was 46 ± 12 and 76 ± 14 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , respectively. The frequency of hyperkalemia (> 5.5 mmol/L) was 4.3% in patients taking 10 mg finerenone, 2.7% among those taking 20 mg and 1.5% among those taking 40 mg. Simulated PK/PD data produced higher serum potassium with higher finerenone exposure in a hypothetical scenario without dose titration; however, when simulating the protocol‐guided dose titration strategy implemented in the trial, the lower observed frequency of hyperkalemia at higher finerenone exposure was explained. For the efficacy exposure–response analyses, while higher finerenone exposure was non‐significantly related to a lower frequency of CV composite events ( p = 0.55), higher exposure did result in a significantly greater reduction in NT‐proBNP concentrations ( p < 0.001). Conclusions Among participants of FINEARTS‐HF, finerenone dose titration was effective in managing serum potassium concentration. Although FINEARTS‐HF was not designed to test a randomized comparison of dose or exposure, the PK/PD model suggests that higher achieved exposure is associated with improved CV efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eißing et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF) (n=6,001). Finerenone vs. Placebo was evaluated on Total heart failure events and cardiovascular death (p=0.55). Higher finerenone exposure reduced NT-proBNP (p<0.001) and was non-significantly related to lower CV composite events (p=0.55), with hyperkalemia rates of 4.3% (10 mg), 2.7% (20 mg), and 1.5% (40 mg).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: